It will be hard to determine a winner among two top-notch matchmakers, POF vs Match. Both portals are efficient in successful partner search. Still, there should be only one winner in this battle. Who wins the competition? This detailed review will figure this out.
Match.com is one of the most long-existing dating portals, with a two-decade presence in the niche. Plenty of Fish is a youngster, compared to its opponent. The portal dates back to 2003. Both have active userbases, where the percentage of male and female users is almost equal. It is a positive sign because most alternatives have a disproportional ratio of men and women, making one’s search more challenging.
Match and POF boast multiple success stories of their former members. Newbies may read about the most romantic matchups on the companies’ sites. Still, Match.com wins in this regard, as it keeps connecting single hearts for more than two decades already. POF has a larger audience, but singles often complain that they bump into inactive users. Match members are more dynamic because the portal is paid. Understandably, people without serious intentions would not pay a hard coin to join the community.
When comparing POF vs Match interfaces, both platforms have one shared aspect, i.e., well-crafted websites. Singles won’t bump into explicit images because moderators strictly control the quality of all published content. Match.com doesn’t look old school, which is a compliment to such a long-lasting cupid. PFO is easy in navigation, but its design seems more outmoded compared to its older opponent. So, the winner in this particular round is Match.com.
Match.com vs Plenty of Fish – which one is better? The choice can be intricate, but some tips will help daters figure out what suits them more.
This POF and Match battle won’t be objective without comparing both cupids’ pricing and membership plans. Singles may join the two websites wholly free, but around 80% of all services on Match.com require a premium subscription.
POF is more easy-going regarding pricing. Daters may even interact through DMs paying nothing. POF members can flirt via voice messages, which also come at no extra fee. They can see singles in their close vicinity and interact with like-minded people on forums. Moreover, Plenty of Fish users may pass a personality test, which boosts their compatibility chances to match a soulmate. On the other hand, free users should prepare to see tons of ads while browsing the platform. They also can’t check if someone visits their profiles.
The POF’s opponent in this Match.com vs Plenty of Fish battle is more expensive. Match provides a dominant’s share of interaction means at an extra charge. Singles can’t get in touch via DMs here, unlike what they can do at POF. The only way to express an interest in someone is via Likes. Free subscribers also can’t see who views them. They receive a list with potential sweethearts, but they can’t search for them using advanced filters. The incognito mode also requires buying a VIP package. Chatrooms are reserved for VIPs only at Match.com. Thus, if daters look for intimate interaction with a potential lovebird, they need to pay a hard coin for entering a virtual chatroom.
Premium package cost comparison
|3 months – $59||2 months – $38|
|6 months – $102||4 months – $48|
|Annual – $192||8 months – $80|
So, who gets a victory in this round – POF or Match? Match creators don’t hide that the service is paid: the free package gives minimal interaction tools and match-finding opportunities. In contrast, POF allows daters to interact via DMs absolutely free. The only miss is annoying ads that pop up while browsing the portal.
The decision is tough, but we have a winner of this round – POF!
The audience quality says a lot about a particular service. If a site has a low profile quality and tons of inactive members, singles have zero chances to find a sweetheart there. Thus, it’s time to evaluate both sites’ community quality to detect the Match and POF competition’s laureate.
It will be fair to start with POF this time. The portal has an almost equal ratio of males (54%) and females (46%). It is a good sign for ladies because they suffer from the lack of men’s attention on similar portals as a rule. The average age of the leading audience is 25-36 y.o. Most singles are straight, though gay people are free to join too. POF positions itself as a reputable matchmaker but not ‘second Tinder.’ The portal creators assure daters that it is not a place for one-night hookups. Still, the research shows that casual affairs and hookups take place among clients. As far as direct interaction doesn’t require draconian charges and comes at no extra fee, many singles join POF for hooking up with hotties nearby. Long-time subscribers complain that they often bump into profiles that no longer exist. Does it mean that the site loses this POF vs Match tournament? Not yet, as now it’s time to check its opponent.
Match is a pioneer in lovebird finding. The online cupid can boast hundreds of happy marriages among its former members. Similar to POF, the ratio of male to female users is almost equal. Ladies make 52% of the community, while guys make 48%. Straight singles dominate on the portal. Still, LGBT representatives are also present. The portal is wholly loyal to daters of different sexual preferences and orientations. The average age of the active audience is 30-45 y.o. It is another proof that Match.com is a place for mature singles on the hunt for lasting unions with their sweethearts. Daters have a minimal risk of bumping into youngsters searching for sex dating. The predominant share of subscribers resides in the USA, though Canadian and Australian community is also present. The Match moderators strictly control this aspect, which means that singles should not worry about receiving inactive matches that left the site a long time ago.
It seems like this round winner of the Match.com vs Plenty of Fish battle is Match.com.
Now, it’s the moment to take a closer inside look at each brand separately. When singles consider joining a dating portal, the first thing that may discourage them is an eternity-lasting sign-up phase. Luckily, it is not the case for Plenty of Fish. It takes around 15 minutes for newbies to join. The cupid doesn’t ask a million questions, except for necessary details: age, height/weight, hobbies, etc. Newcomers can’t join via social networks, and someone would miss the option to transfer the data from their Facebook accounts. Still, most singles don’t like to link their social networks to matchmaking portals. Users may attach up to 20 photos entirely free.
The POF’s peculiarity is that most interacting activities come at no extra charge. Singles don’t even need to hurt their bankroll to pay for a mega-expensive subscription. It’s an undeniable benefit in this POF vs Match competition. Another great moment is that POF daters may record voice messages. It is very convenient for those who prefer to stay in touch on-the-go. Users may create a Favorite list with potential candidates on winning their hearts. Moderators stand for loyal and friendly interaction and block all messages with explicit, offensive, and abusive content. Singles may also search for partners en route via the handy POF app. It’s good to realize that the service takes care of such matters.
The POF’s miss is a bit old school interface. It is not what POF and Match have in common, as the latter can boast a more stylish layout. Plenty of Fish has several cool features. One of them is the so-called compatibility quiz. The best thing is that hotties may pass the quiz wholly free. The test aims to reveal people’s relationship goals and character traits, which they want to see in a potential lover. POF uses a Chemistry Predictor option to analyze the test results and connect singles with the most appropriate daters that match their needs and goals.
Another POF’s cool feature is somewhat similar to Tinder. It is the MeetMe option, which works by the well-known swiping principle. In other words, singles swipe on Yes or No other members. If matching happens, the two of them may start flirting in DMs. There is also an option to express a boosted admiration in someone by sending a Super Yes. Singles can’t exchange gifts for free; this option requires purchasing a VIP package. The same refers to advanced filters.
What about the second participant of this Match vs POF competition? Match.com is a ‘dinosaur’ in the industry, and hundreds of successful marriages prove its efficiency. The cupid opts for lasting unions for life, and it becomes evident even at the registration stage. The company applies an online builder to help newcomers make their profiles detailed, eye-catching, and informative. Newbies need to fill in a short ‘About Me’ form to introduce their best traits to the rest of the community. Daters may attach up to 50 photos to boost their profiles.
The Match’s unbeaten privilege is tons of ace features, making the interaction more pleasurable and the lovebird search process more hassle-free. The service presents members with a list of potential sweethearts daily. Those who want to take the initiative in their hands may apply an enhanced filtering system, which generates potential partners based on their chemistry, interests, relationship goals, vicinities, etc.
Match and POF both stand for meaningful relationships, but Match.com proves this statement with deeds. Singles may relish intimate conversation with like-minded individuals in chatrooms. They may switch on their cams during video dates to feel a closer bond with a person on the opposite side of the screen. When people feel a particular connection, they may go to another level and interact via phone. Members shouldn’t worry about revealing their real phone numbers because all calls come from the company’s anonymous line.
Match.com stands for tense-free interaction and uses the gaming approach to the lovebird search process. Singles can play the hot-or-not game. It is swiping other hotties that interest or don’t interest you. Finally, there is a guarantee feature. It means that if singles fail to find sweethearts during six months on the site, Match will make a refund for the entire period. It is a proven sign that the company has no doubts about its efficiency, considering successful matchmaking.
So, who will get the crown in this tense Match.com vs Plenty of Fish battle? Let’s summarize the pros and cons of both. Although POF founders assure daters that it is not a hookup portal, many hotties join it precisely for this reason. Free messaging attracts youngsters hunting for one-night hookups, which will unlikely please mature singles searching for meaningful connections. In contrast, Match proves its multi-year efficiency in finding sweethearts for life. The site applies solid filters and algorithms to match singles, and hundreds of happy marriages among former members are vivid evidence.
The Match and POF battle was tense, but we have a winner. Drumroll, please! Congratulations to Match.com!